When Elizabeth Newman went for an interview to study at the Victorian College of the Arts in 1980, she was told she couldn’t draw. At that very moment, she says, she knew she had been accepted to the school.
For more than 30 years now, Newman has actively avoided that trap of technical proficiency, shifting mediums and modes to evade the mastery that follows from practice. This isn’t obdurateness, but the result of Newman pursuing something else, something more important, first hinted at during that VCA interview all those years ago.
“I’m interested in something of my subjectivity that is expressed through trying to make something that always fails to some extent,” she says. As such, it’s no insult to call the paintings in her upcoming solo exhibition at Neon Parc, The effect that is propagated is not from the communication of speech but from the displacement of discourse, a series of failures.
A collection of faux hard-edge geometric paintings fall short of the exactitude they allude to, marked by in- consistent layering and unsteady lines. Even in the more expressive, organic paintings, where a sense of incom- pleteness might otherwise pass undetected, the feeling that something has been cut short shines through.
“I like to end a bit before the end,” Newman says. “I like to leave things a bit undone. There’s a question hanging there. In a way, the question is, is this a painting? How much do you need for it to be a painting? Is one stroke enough? A blob?”
This is no neutral act. In these uncertain times, art has tended to respond with certainty. We live in an age of statements, positions, artists tied to the masts of ideas. Where Newman offers questions, many fall back on answers.
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. And if it is broke, at least acknowledge it. In these broken times, Newman says, “what I’m putting out there is also broken, all bits and pieces”.
To call something broken isn’t necessarily to imply it doesn’t function. In fact, the very brokenness in Newman’s paintings renders them nimble when it comes to conveying a sense of subjectivity.
One can even notice a slight emotional shift among the paintings in the Neon Parc exhibition, between those made in 2015 and those made in 2016, before an Australia Council Cité Internationale des Arts residency in Paris and afterwards.
On Newman’s return from the residency, she felt more emotionally open. Looking back at the paintings she made before Paris, she found them “uptight”. The ones that follow are rougher, even more unfinished.
But all of them have something in common: nothing. “Whenever I paint,” Newman says, “I paint about nothing – I just paint about painting.”
In an essay for Newman’s 2013 monograph More than what there is, Damiano Bertoli took it one step further, describing her practice as a “reflexive catalogue of meta-painting: paintings of other paintings, paintings about paintings, paintings about paint, and its absence. Paintings and not; images, objects and arrangements that inhabit the psychic space elaborated by the history of painting and its capacity to activate the human ‘subject’, with or without pigment, or application.”
From time to time, Newman has turned to other mediums including installation, collage, text work, photography and sculpture – mediums, she says, she’s “not very good at”, the idea being to “find that thing in there that’s me”.
Over the past few years, she has returned to pure painting, a throwback to something simple, from an earlier period of her life, when she first began to make art. “It’s the most basic kind of art making,” she says. “Painting is unpretentious in that way.”
Even so, it isn’t without its difficulties. “I always feel like an amateur,” Newman says “I always feel like I don’t know how to paint.”
Just as she was told more than 30 years ago that she couldn’t draw, it’s safe to say that Newman can’t paint – and it’s a very good thing she can’t.